1990～2013年国际生态补偿研究文献计量分析
龚兴兰,张昌玉,庞琼
摘要(Abstract)：
生态补偿是把外部的、环境的非市场价值转变为现实经济来补偿给因保护生态系统和环境的投入或放弃发展机会而导致损失的个人或区域。近年来,世界各国和各相关研究机构不断加大了对生态补偿的研究力度。本文以Web of Science数据库为基础,对1990年~2013年国际生态补偿研究文献进行了定量和定性分析。结果表明,2013年的生态补偿研究论文的数量是1997年的10倍;Ecological Economics、PNAS和Conservation Biology期刊的TGCS和TLCS均排在前三;Wunder S、Corbera E、Pascual U等5人为生态补偿研究的权威作者。美国、英国和瑞士等发达国家在生态补偿领域的论文具有较大影响力,中国发文量位居第二,但在TLCS和GLCS等重要指标上不占优势。剑桥大学、斯坦福大学和东安格利亚大学等机构的论文影响力较大。图1表7参25
关键词(KeyWords)：
生态补偿;文献计量;Web of Science数据库
基金项目(Foundation):
作者(Author):
龚兴兰,张昌玉,庞琼
DOI: 10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2017.04.009
参考文献(References)：
- [1]刘春腊,刘卫东,陆大道.1987-2012年中国生态补偿研究进展及趋势[J].地理科学进展,2013,32(12):1780~1792.
- [2]叶文虎,魏斌,仝川.城市生态补偿能力衡量和应用[J].中国环境科学,1998,18(4):298~301.
- [3]齐青.Web of Science的检索和应用[J].图书馆工作与研究,2013(2):110~112.
- [4]刘爱原,郭玉清,李世颖,等.从文献计量角度分析中国生物多样性研究现状[J].生态学报,2012,32(24):7635~7643.
- [5]王金平,高峰,张志强,等.国际生态系统研究发展态势文献计量分析[J].地理科学进展,2010,25(10):1101~1111.
- [6]贺郝钰,侯春梅,迟秀丽,等.国际生物土壤结皮研究发展态势文献计量分析[J].生态学报,2014,34(4):1035~1041.
- [7]王雪梅,曲建升,李延梅,等.生物多样性国际研究态势分析[J].生态学报,2010,30(4):1066~1073.
- [8]于艺婧,马锦义,袁韵珏.中国园林生态学发展综述[J].生态学报,2013,33(9):2665~2675.
- [9]Scheer SJ,Michael TB,Kerstin C,Molly L.Developing Future Ecosystem Service Payments in China:Lessons Learned from International Experience.A Report Prepared for the China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development(CCICED)Task force on Eco-compensation,Forest Trends,2006.
- [10]李文华,李芬,李世东,等.森林生态效益补偿的研究现状与展望[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(5):677~687.
- [11]邱均平,王明芝.1999—2008年国内数字图书馆研究论文的计量分析[J].情报杂志,2010,29(2):1~5.
- [12]Benavent R A,Zurian JC V,Gomez M C,Melendez R S,Molina C N.Impact factor of the Spanish medical journals[J].Med Clin,2004,123(18):697~701.
- [13]刘婧.文献作者分布规律研究—对近十五年来国内洛特卡定律、普赖斯定律研究成果综述[J].情报科学,2004,22(1):123~128.
- [14]Hirsch JE.An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output[J].Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2005,102(46):16569~16572.
- [15]Engel S,Pagiola S,Wunder S.Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice:An overview of the issues[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(4):663~674.
- [16]Wunder S,Engel S,Pagiola S.Taking stock:A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(4):834~852.
- [17]Wunder S.The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation[J].Conservation Biology,2007,21(1):48~58.
- [18]Muradian R,Corbera E,Pascual U,Pascual U,Kosoy N,H.May P.Reconciling theory and practice:An alternative conceptual framework for unders-tanding payments for environmental services[J].Ecological Economics,2010,69(6):1202~1208.
- [19]Jack BK,Kousky C,Sims KRE.Designing payments for ecosystem services:Lessons from previous experience with incentivebased mechanisms[J].PNAS,2008,105(28):9465~9470.
- [20]Ferraro PJ.Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(4):810~821.
- [21]Vatn A.An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services[J].Ecological Economics,2010,69(6):1245~1252.
- [22]Kosoy N,Corbera E.Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism[J].Ecological Economics,2010,69(6):1228~1236.
- [23]Wunscher T,Engel S,Wunder S.Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services:A tool for boosting conservation benefits[J].Ecological Economics,2008,65(4):822~833.
- [24]Ferraro PJ.Global habitat protection:Limitations of development interventions and a role for conservation performance payments[J].Conservation Biology,2001,15(4):990~1000.
- [25]高懋芳,邱建军,刘三超,等.基于文献计量的农业面源污染研究发展态势分析[J].中国农业科学,2014,47(6):1140~1150.